FreedomsAdvocate.com

Here is a 13-minute, Fox News Sunday interview with US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. Justice Breyer is promoting his latest book. Such interviews are rare and Breyer discusses his view of the proper method of Constitution interpretation. Breyer's defense of his dissent from Heller is classic. He begins by claiming that Madison was compelled to included the 2nd Amendment in 1789--after the Constitution was already ratified--because his opponents would call up the state militias and nationalize them. Next he claims that the majority of historians support his view. The intellectual dishonesty of the man is chilling. This is a must see.

This Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation video shows just how easy it can be to balance the budget. Pay particular attention to the CATO Institute's Dan Mitchell and his explanation of  how Washington defines a 'Cut'.

By far, this is one of the best videos I have seen regarding our current sovereign debt crisis. In May, 2010, the Peterson Institute for International Economics sponsored a lecture by Niall Ferguson, of Harvard Business School and the London School of Economics on the history of sovereign debt crises entitled: Fiscal Crises and Imperial Collapses: Historical Perspective on Current

The news media routinely tries to conflate 'non-agression' with 'pacifism'. They are (what's new!) wrong. Pacifism is a renunciation of aggression; non-aggression is restraint from aggression. There is a big difference. The Quakers and some Buddists are a good examples of pacificism, as they will not respond to aggression under any circumstances. The Swiss, on the other hand, are a perfect example of the principles of non-aggression, as they will attack no-one, but will defend themselves if attacked. 

Not surprisingly, the Swiss have their own equivalent to our 2nd Amendment. Take a look at this short video: